Kusserow on Compliance: Meeting nursing home compliance program legal mandates

The November 28, 2019 deadline approaches for skilled nursing facilities and nursing homes to adopt and implement an effective compliance and ethics program as a condition of participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. At that time, state survey agencies will begin assessing facility compliance with implementation of an effective compliance and ethics program. Yet, the OIG continues to find major problems with that health care sector. The OIG recently reported that posthospital extended care services or Medicare beneficiary coverage must be preceded by an inpatient stay in a hospital for not less than three consecutive calendar days. The OIG found that CMS improperly paid 65 of the 99 skilled nursing facility (SNF) claims sampled by the OIG.  Projecting from its sample, the OIG estimated that CMS improperly paid $84 million for SNF services over a two-year period.

Those nursing homes that followed the OIG guidance will have little problem in meeting the new mandate, but those who did not have only months to come into compliance. Organizations trying to catch up should consider having a compliance expert perform a gap analysis to identify elements needed for the compliance program and how be able to evidence program effectiveness. A gap analysis should provide a “road map” and step-by-step plan for bringing a facility into compliance with the mandates. Those that have already implemented a compliance program should consider having an effectiveness evaluation conducted by experts to verify that the program will meet mandated standards.

For more information about meeting the standards of these new mandates, Tom Herrmann may be reached at thermmann@strategicm.com or at (703) 535-1410.

Richard P. Kusserow served as DHHS Inspector General for 11 years. He currently is CEO of Strategic Management Services, LLC (SM), a firm that has assisted more than 3,000 organizations and entities with compliance related matters. The SM sister company, CRC, provides a wide range of compliance tools including sanction-screening.

Connect with Richard Kusserow on Google+ or LinkedIn.

Subscribe to the Kusserow on Compliance Newsletter

Copyright © 2019 Strategic Management Services, LLC. Published with permission.

Kusserow on Compliance: CMS announced updates to nursing home ratings

CMS announced updates in April 2019 to Nursing Home Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. Its purpose is to provide tools for consumers to compare quality between nursing homes. This comes in advance of the November 28, 2019 deadline for skilled nursing facilities and nursing homes to have implemented an effective compliance and ethics program as a condition of participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The new tools announced have been created to help consumers, their families, and caregivers compare nursing homes and identify areas they may want to ask about when looking at nursing home care. Nursing Home Compare has a quality rating system that gives each nursing home a rating between 1 and 5 stars and those with 5 stars are considered to have above average quality and nursing homes with 1 star are considered to have quality below average. There is also a separate rating for each of the following three factors:

 

  1. Health Inspections include findings on compliance to Medicare/Medicaid health and safety requirements from onsite surveys conducted by state survey agencies at nursing homes.
  2. Staffing Levels are the numbers of RNs available to care for patients in a nursing home at any given time.
  3. Quality Measures for care are based on resident assessment and Medicare claims data.

 

The April 2019 changes include revisions to the inspection process, enhancement of new staffing information, implementation of new quality measures, and lifting of the “freeze” on the health inspection ratings instituted in February 2018 to hold up the star rating score until all nursing homes were surveyed at least once under the new survey process. In April, users of the site will be able to see the most up to date status of a facility’s compliance, which is a very strong reflection of a facility’s ability to improve and protect each resident’s health and safety. CMS is also setting higher thresholds and evidence-based standards for nursing homes’ staffing levels, recognizing that nurses have the greatest impact on the quality of care nursing homes deliver. As such, CMS is assigning an automatic one-star rating when a Nursing Home facility reports no RN is onsite. In April 2019, the threshold for the number of days without an RN onsite in a quarter that triggers an automatic downgrade to one-star will be reduced from seven days to four days. The new Update includes:

 

  • changes to the quality component to improve the identification of quality differences among nursing homes, raising expectations for quality, and incentivizing continuous quality improvement;
  • adding measures of long-stay hospitalizations and emergency room transfers;
  • removing duplicative and less meaningful measures;
  • establishing separate quality ratings for short-stay and long-stay residents; and
  • revising the rating thresholds to better identify the differences in quality among nursing homes making it easier for consumers to find the information needed to make decisions.

 

Richard P. Kusserow served as DHHS Inspector General for 11 years. He currently is CEO of Strategic Management Services, LLC (SM), a firm that has assisted more than 3,000 organizations and entities with compliance related matters. The SM sister company, CRC, provides a wide range of compliance tools including sanction-screening.

Connect with Richard Kusserow on Google+ or LinkedIn.

Subscribe to the Kusserow on Compliance Newsletter

Copyright © 2019 Strategic Management Services, LLC. Published with permission.

Kusserow on Compliance: Meeting sanction checking mandates

As the HHS Inspector General, I created what is now referred to as the List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (LEIE) that was followed by OIG compliance guidance documents which call for checking employees, physicians, vendors, and contractors against the LEIE. The OIG considers all claims and costs associated with an excluded party as potentially false and fraudulent and can lead to significant financial penalties and more. The OIG Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion provides very useful information in assessing this risk area. CMS mandates, as a condition of enrollment, providers may not employ or contract with individuals or entities that are excluded from participation in any federal health care program and call for checking not only against the LEIE, but also the General Service Administration’s (GSA) Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), now part of the System for Award Management (SAM). CMS further called upon State Medicaid Directors to establish their own sanction data base and requires providers to check it on a monthly basis. To date, 40 states have moved to establish their own Medicaid sanction lists with other states in the process of doing the same. This has increased the sanction screening burden exponentially, not only for the compliance office but other departments as well. HR often has responsibility of sanction checking new hires and periodically current employees. Procurement is also affected because they handle the screening of vendors and contractors. The Medical Credentialing Office must ensure checking on physicians who have been granted staff privileges.  Other federal sanction databases worth screening are maintained by the DEA and FDA, as well as the Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Terrorist Watch List.

Daniel Peake, of the Compliance Resource Center (CRC), works with clients to provide a variety of CRC services that includes providing sanction checking services, as well as the investigation and resolution of potential hits. He noted that the time and resources necessary for developing and maintaining a search engine, along with regularly collecting and updating sanction information from many databases is not very cost effective. This high cost of using internal resources to develop and manage the sanction checking has resulted in the great majority of health care entities subscribing to a vendor service that provides a search engine to their established databases. Vendors can afford the high cost of maintaining the currency of the data because they amortize the costs over many clients. The problem is that that vendor quality, cost, and reliability can vary enormously.  From experience, he offered the following tips for those considering a vendor:

 

Tips on choosing a vendor search engine service

  1. Know the cost up front with a fixed rate, not based upon per click searches.
  2. Contract should permit cancelling without cause at any time, if dissatisfied.
  3. Ensure vendor has liability insurance ($ 1 to 3 million preferably).
  4. Determine other services included (e.g. policy templates, regulatory updates, etc.).
  5. Determine how much “help desk” assistance is available to resolve potential hits.

 

For more information, contact Daniel Peake at (dpeake@complianceresource.com) (703-236-9854).

Richard P. Kusserow served as DHHS Inspector General for 11 years. He currently is CEO of Strategic Management Services, LLC (SM), a firm that has assisted more than 3,000 organizations and entities with compliance related matters. The SM sister company, CRC, provides a wide range of compliance tools including sanction-screening.

Connect with Richard Kusserow on Google+ or LinkedIn.

Subscribe to the Kusserow on Compliance Newsletter

Copyright © 2019 Strategic Management Services, LLC. Published with permission.

Kusserow on Compliance: OIG Work Plan update

The OIG Work Plan sets forth various projects including OIG audits and evaluations that are underway or planned to be addressed during the fiscal year and beyond. Projects included in the Work Plan span the Department and include CMS. The OIG also plans work related to issues that cut across departmental programs, including state and local governments’ use of federal funds. At the end of December, the OIG announced two new projects led by the Office of Evaluation and Inspection beginning in 2019. They are:

  1. T-MSIS Data Assessment: Usefulness of National Data to Monitor Opioid Prescribing in Medicaid. Although all States have been submitting T-MSIS data, it does not mean the data are complete and without complete data, it cannot be used as a national dataset to help Medicaid manage critical issues such as the opioid crisis. The will OIG determine whether T-MSIS contains the data necessary to identify recipients of opioid prescriptions through Medicaid who may be at risk of opioid abuse nationally.  The OIG intends to interview states to determine the challenges they face, if any, in submitting the data necessary to identify and prevent beneficiary harm from opioid misuse.

 

  1. States’ Compliance with FFS and MCO Provider Enrollment Requirements. The OIG noted that provider enrollment is a key program integrity tool to protect Medicaid from fraudulent and abusive providers. The 21st Century Cures Act requires states to enroll all Medicaid providers, both those in Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) and managed care organizations (MCOs). This study, by the OIG, is mandated by the Cures Act and will survey state Medicaid agencies about their enrollment of FFS and managed care providers and implementation of required provider enrollment screening activities.

 

Richard P. Kusserow served as DHHS Inspector General for 11 years. He currently is CEO of Strategic Management Services, LLC (SM), a firm that has assisted more than 3,000 organizations and entities with compliance related matters. The SM sister company, CRC, provides a wide range of compliance tools including sanction-screening.

Connect with Richard Kusserow on Google+ or LinkedIn.

Subscribe to the Kusserow on Compliance Newsletter

Copyright © 2018 Strategic Management Services, LLC. Published with permission.