Medicare payments to hospitals that serve a disproportionate share of poor people will continue to decrease in fiscal year (FY) 2015. In FY 2015 CMS calculates that the total amount available for the Medicare disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payment will decrease by $1.225 billion compared to the amount available in FY 2014. This decrease should come as no surprise to anyone as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (P.L. 111-148) required these reductions. The thinking was that DHS payment should decrease because as more and more individuals obtain health insurance coverage or are enrolled in an expanded Medicaid, there will be fewer and fewer people who will not be able to pay or have their hospital bills paid for them. And this has been found to be just the case as the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation reported that uncompensated care was reduced by $5.7 billion in 2014. The great majority of this reduction though came in states that had expanded Medicaid eligibility, putting hospitals in states that did not expand Medicaid eligibility in a particularly difficult spot; they will be receiving less in DSH payments, but the amount of uncompensated care is not decreasing.
DSH payments began in the 1980s as a way to provide more money to hospitals that serve a poorer population of people who cannot afford to pay or have some other entity like insurance or a public health program pay for their hospital bills. Section 3133 of the ACA dramatically changed how DSH payments would be calculated. All hospitals would receive 25 percent of what they would have received under the pre-ACA system. The remaining amount would come from a pool of money the amount of which is calculated based on the change in the percentage of uninsured from the current year to the year just prior to the year the ACA was signed. As the number of uninsured decreased so would the amount available to hospitals in their DSH payments. For FY 2014 CMS calculated that the percentage of uninsured declined from 18 percent during the year prior to the ACA’s adoption to 16 percent. For FY 2015 CMS has calculated that the percentage of uninsured is 13.75 percent of the population.
These two reductions have resulted in a corresponding reductions in the amount available for uncompensated care payments, or the portion of the DSH payment not equaling 25 percent of what the DSH payment would have been if the changes in the ACA were no adopted. For FY 2015 the amount of money for uncompensated care payments is $7.6 billion which is down from $9.033 billion in FY 2014. CMS estimated in the Final rule updating the hospital inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) for FY 2015 that hospitals would see approximately a 1.3 percent reduction in the amount of their DSH payments from FY 2014.
The percentage is less than one would expect because during this time period the amount available for the original 25 percent has increased from year to year somewhat offsetting the decrease in uncompensated care payments. This increase is primarily due to the increase in the number of Medicaid recipient due to the expansion of Medicaid, but it also is attributable to just an overall increase in the payment amount over time. In FY 2014 $3.193 billion was avialable to pay the pre-ACA amount and in the FY 2015 this amount was increased to $3.345 billion. The number of Medicaid patients a hospital treats is used to determine the amount of the hospital pre-ACA DSH payment.
An increase in the amount of Medicaid patients has resulted in a significant decrease in the cost of uncompensated care by hospitals. HHS is reporting that FY 2014 hospitals incurred $5.7 billion less in uncompensated care costs due to an increase in the number of patients that are now covered by an expanded Medicaid.
This decrease in uncompensated care costs did not occur in states that did not expand Medicaid eligibility. Hospitals in those states find themselves in a difficult situation as they are receiving less DSH payments, but are not seeing an increase in revenue from patients with Medicaid or private insurance coverage. Many of these hospitals rely heavily on DSH payments and decreases in the amount of money they receive could have dire consequences for these institutions and the people they serve